Check self format for the whole repo (#3750)

[etc/vim.git] / docs / the_black_code_style / future_style.md

diff --git a/docs/the_black_code_style/future_style.md b/docs/the_black_code_style/future_style.md
index 8d159e9b0a21cf0890934b56f48e8f1931901ca6..861bb64bff4d10016fde5db5230d887fbca364ec 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/the_black_code_style/future_style.md
+++ b/docs/the_black_code_style/future_style.md
@@ -19,26 +19,41 @@ with make_context_manager1() as cm1, make_context_manager2() as cm2, make_contex
     ...  # nothing to split on - line too long
 ```
 
-So _Black_ will eventually format it like this:
+So _Black_ will, when we implement this, format it like this:
 
 ```py3
 with \
-     make_context_manager(1) as cm1, \
-     make_context_manager(2) as cm2, \
-     make_context_manager(3) as cm3, \
-     make_context_manager(4) as cm4 \
+     make_context_manager1() as cm1, \
+     make_context_manager2() as cm2, \
+     make_context_manager3() as cm3, \
+     make_context_manager4() as cm4 \
 :
     ...  # backslashes and an ugly stranded colon
 ```
 
-Although when the target version is Python 3.9 or higher, _Black_ will use parentheses
-instead since they're allowed in Python 3.9 and higher.
+Although when the target version is Python 3.9 or higher, _Black_ uses parentheses
+instead in `--preview` mode (see below) since they're allowed in Python 3.9 and higher.
+
+An alternative to consider if the backslashes in the above formatting are undesirable is
+to use {external:py:obj}`contextlib.ExitStack` to combine context managers in the
+following way:
+
+```python
+with contextlib.ExitStack() as exit_stack:
+    cm1 = exit_stack.enter_context(make_context_manager1())
+    cm2 = exit_stack.enter_context(make_context_manager2())
+    cm3 = exit_stack.enter_context(make_context_manager3())
+    cm4 = exit_stack.enter_context(make_context_manager4())
+    ...
+```
+
+(labels/preview-style)=
 
 ## Preview style
 
 Experimental, potentially disruptive style changes are gathered under the `--preview`
 CLI flag. At the end of each year, these changes may be adopted into the default style,
-as described in [The Black Code Style](./index.rst). Because the functionality is
+as described in [The Black Code Style](index.md). Because the functionality is
 experimental, feedback and issue reports are highly encouraged!
 
 ### Improved string processing
@@ -50,27 +65,98 @@ limit. Line continuation backslashes are converted into parenthesized strings.
 Unnecessary parentheses are stripped. The stability and status of this feature is
 tracked in [this issue](https://github.com/psf/black/issues/2188).
 
-### Removing trailing newlines after code block open
+### Improved line breaks
+
+For assignment expressions, _Black_ now prefers to split and wrap the right side of the
+assignment instead of left side. For example:
+
+```python
+some_dict[
+    "with_a_long_key"
+] = some_looooooooong_module.some_looooooooooooooong_function_name(
+    first_argument, second_argument, third_argument
+)
+```
+
+will be changed to:
+
+```python
+some_dict["with_a_long_key"] = (
+    some_looooooooong_module.some_looooooooooooooong_function_name(
+        first_argument, second_argument, third_argument
+    )
+)
+```
+
+### Improved parentheses management
 
-_Black_ will remove trailing newlines after code block openings. That means that the
-following code:
+For dict literals with long values, they are now wrapped in parentheses. Unnecessary
+parentheses are now removed. For example:
 
 ```python
-def my_func():
+my_dict = {
+    "a key in my dict": a_very_long_variable
+    * and_a_very_long_function_call()
+    / 100000.0,
+    "another key": (short_value),
+}
+```
+
+will be changed to:
+
+```python
+my_dict = {
+    "a key in my dict": (
+        a_very_long_variable * and_a_very_long_function_call() / 100000.0
+    ),
+    "another key": short_value,
+}
+```
+
+### Improved multiline string handling
+
+_Black_ is smarter when formatting multiline strings, especially in function arguments,
+to avoid introducing extra line breaks. Previously, it would always consider multiline
+strings as not fitting on a single line. With this new feature, _Black_ looks at the
+context around the multiline string to decide if it should be inlined or split to a
+separate line. For example, when a multiline string is passed to a function, _Black_
+will only split the multiline string if a line is too long or if multiple arguments are
+being passed.
 
-    print("The line above me will be deleted!")
+For example, _Black_ will reformat
 
-    print("But the line above me won't!")
+```python
+textwrap.dedent(
+    """\
+    This is a
+    multiline string
+"""
+)
 ```
 
-Will be changed to:
+to:
 
 ```python
-def my_func():
-    print("The line above me will be deleted!")
+textwrap.dedent("""\
+    This is a
+    multiline string
+""")
+```
 
-    print("But the line above me won't!")
+And:
+
+```python
+MULTILINE = """
+foobar
+""".replace(
+    "\n", ""
+)
 ```
 
-This new feature will be applied to **all code blocks**: `def`, `class`, `if`, `for`,
-`while`, `with`, `case` and `match`.
+to:
+
+```python
+MULTILINE = """
+foobar
+""".replace("\n", "")
+```