X-Git-Url: https://git.madduck.net/etc/vim.git/blobdiff_plain/3d96b7f10a56fcf826693e98f08b673dad8ac256..1a20c4d4874f912822f6a42cb61816330a4f6508:/docs/contributing/gauging_changes.md?ds=inline diff --git a/docs/contributing/gauging_changes.md b/docs/contributing/gauging_changes.md index b41c7a3..8562a83 100644 --- a/docs/contributing/gauging_changes.md +++ b/docs/contributing/gauging_changes.md @@ -7,36 +7,52 @@ It's recommended you evaluate the quantifiable changes your _Black_ formatting modification causes before submitting a PR. Think about if the change seems disruptive enough to cause frustration to projects that are already "black formatted". -## black-primer +## diff-shades -`black-primer` is a tool built for CI (and humans) to have _Black_ `--check` a number of -Git accessible projects in parallel. (configured in `primer.json`) _(A PR will be -accepted to add Mercurial support.)_ +diff-shades is a tool that runs _Black_ across a list of open-source projects recording +the results. The main highlight feature of diff-shades is being able to compare two +revisions of _Black_. This is incredibly useful as it allows us to see what exact +changes will occur, say merging a certain PR. -### Run flow +For more information, please see the [diff-shades documentation][diff-shades]. -- Ensure we have a `black` + `git` in PATH -- Load projects from `primer.json` -- Run projects in parallel with `--worker` workers (defaults to CPU count / 2) - - Checkout projects - - Run black and record result - - Clean up repository checkout _(can optionally be disabled via `--keep`)_ -- Display results summary to screen -- Default to cleaning up `--work-dir` (which defaults to tempfile schemantics) -- Return - - 0 for successful run - - \< 0 for environment / internal error - - \> 0 for each project with an error +### CI integration -### Speed up runs 🏎 +diff-shades is also the tool behind the "diff-shades results comparing ..." / +"diff-shades reports zero changes ..." comments on PRs. The project has a GitHub Actions +workflow that analyzes and compares two revisions of _Black_ according to these rules: -If you're running locally yourself to test black on lots of code try: +| | Baseline revision | Target revision | +| --------------------- | ----------------------- | ---------------------------- | +| On PRs | latest commit on `main` | PR commit with `main` merged | +| On pushes (main only) | latest PyPI version | the pushed commit | -- Using `-k` / `--keep` + `-w` / `--work-dir` so you don't have to re-checkout the repo - each run +For pushes to main, there's only one analysis job named `preview-changes` where the +preview style is used for all projects. -### CLI arguments +For PRs they get one more analysis job: `assert-no-changes`. It's similar to +`preview-changes` but runs with the stable code style. It will fail if changes were +made. This makes sure code won't be reformatted again and again within the same year in +accordance to Black's stability policy. -```{program-output} black-primer --help +Additionally for PRs, a PR comment will be posted embedding a summary of the preview +changes and links to further information. If there's a pre-existing diff-shades comment, +it'll be updated instead the next time the workflow is triggered on the same PR. +```{note} +The `preview-changes` job will only fail intentionally if while analyzing a file failed to +format. Otherwise a failure indicates a bug in the workflow. ``` + +The workflow uploads several artifacts upon completion: + +- The raw analyses (.json) +- HTML diffs (.html) +- `.pr-comment.json` (if triggered by a PR) + +The last one is downloaded by the `diff-shades-comment` workflow and shouldn't be +downloaded locally. The HTML diffs come in handy for push-based where there's no PR to +post a comment. And the analyses exist just in case you want to do further analysis +using the collected data locally. + +[diff-shades]: https://github.com/ichard26/diff-shades#readme