X-Git-Url: https://git.madduck.net/etc/vim.git/blobdiff_plain/f2ea461e9e9fa5c47bb61fd72d512c748928badc..7e2b2d4784ef8b66b2201ac936f2f9fcab936515:/src/black/lines.py?ds=inline diff --git a/src/black/lines.py b/src/black/lines.py index 63225c0..f35665c 100644 --- a/src/black/lines.py +++ b/src/black/lines.py @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ import itertools import sys from typing import ( Callable, - Collection, Dict, Iterator, List, @@ -22,7 +21,7 @@ from black.mode import Mode from black.nodes import STANDALONE_COMMENT, TEST_DESCENDANTS from black.nodes import BRACKETS, OPENING_BRACKETS, CLOSING_BRACKETS from black.nodes import syms, whitespace, replace_child, child_towards -from black.nodes import is_multiline_string, is_import, is_type_comment, last_two_except +from black.nodes import is_multiline_string, is_import, is_type_comment from black.nodes import is_one_tuple_between # types @@ -277,7 +276,9 @@ class Line: if self.is_import: return True - if not is_one_tuple_between(closing.opening_bracket, closing, self.leaves): + if closing.opening_bracket is not None and not is_one_tuple_between( + closing.opening_bracket, closing, self.leaves + ): return True return False @@ -447,11 +448,38 @@ class EmptyLineTracker: before = 0 depth = current_line.depth while self.previous_defs and self.previous_defs[-1] >= depth: - self.previous_defs.pop() if self.is_pyi: - before = 0 if depth else 1 + assert self.previous_line is not None + if depth and not current_line.is_def and self.previous_line.is_def: + # Empty lines between attributes and methods should be preserved. + before = min(1, before) + elif depth: + before = 0 + else: + before = 1 else: - before = 1 if depth else 2 + if depth: + before = 1 + elif ( + not depth + and self.previous_defs[-1] + and current_line.leaves[-1].type == token.COLON + and ( + current_line.leaves[0].value + not in ("with", "try", "for", "while", "if", "match") + ) + ): + # We shouldn't add two newlines between an indented function and + # a dependent non-indented clause. This is to avoid issues with + # conditional function definitions that are technically top-level + # and therefore get two trailing newlines, but look weird and + # inconsistent when they're followed by elif, else, etc. This is + # worse because these functions only get *one* preceding newline + # already. + before = 1 + else: + before = 2 + self.previous_defs.pop() if current_line.is_decorator or current_line.is_def or current_line.is_class: return self._maybe_empty_lines_for_class_or_def(current_line, before) @@ -501,10 +529,12 @@ class EmptyLineTracker: return 0, 0 if self.is_pyi: - if self.previous_line.depth > current_line.depth: - newlines = 1 - elif current_line.is_class or self.previous_line.is_class: - if current_line.is_stub_class and self.previous_line.is_stub_class: + if current_line.is_class or self.previous_line.is_class: + if self.previous_line.depth < current_line.depth: + newlines = 0 + elif self.previous_line.depth > current_line.depth: + newlines = 1 + elif current_line.is_stub_class and self.previous_line.is_stub_class: # No blank line between classes with an empty body newlines = 0 else: @@ -512,15 +542,20 @@ class EmptyLineTracker: elif ( current_line.is_def or current_line.is_decorator ) and not self.previous_line.is_def: - # Blank line between a block of functions (maybe with preceding - # decorators) and a block of non-functions + if current_line.depth: + # In classes empty lines between attributes and methods should + # be preserved. + newlines = min(1, before) + else: + # Blank line between a block of functions (maybe with preceding + # decorators) and a block of non-functions + newlines = 1 + elif self.previous_line.depth > current_line.depth: newlines = 1 else: newlines = 0 else: - newlines = 2 - if current_line.depth and newlines: - newlines -= 1 + newlines = 1 if current_line.depth else 2 return newlines, 0 @@ -609,7 +644,6 @@ def can_be_split(line: Line) -> bool: def can_omit_invisible_parens( line: Line, line_length: int, - omit_on_explode: Collection[LeafID] = (), ) -> bool: """Does `line` have a shape safe to reformat without optional parens around it? @@ -647,12 +681,6 @@ def can_omit_invisible_parens( penultimate = line.leaves[-2] last = line.leaves[-1] - if line.magic_trailing_comma: - try: - penultimate, last = last_two_except(line.leaves, omit=omit_on_explode) - except LookupError: - # Turns out we'd omit everything. We cannot skip the optional parentheses. - return False if ( last.type == token.RPAR @@ -674,10 +702,6 @@ def can_omit_invisible_parens( # unnecessary. return True - if line.magic_trailing_comma and penultimate.type == token.COMMA: - # The rightmost non-omitted bracket pair is the one we want to explode on. - return True - if _can_omit_closing_paren(line, last=last, line_length=line_length): return True