import logging
import multiprocessing
import os
+import re
import sys
import types
import unittest
List,
Optional,
Sequence,
+ Type,
TypeVar,
Union,
)
import click
import pytest
-import re
from click import unstyle
from click.testing import CliRunner
from pathspec import PathSpec
dump_to_stderr,
ff,
fs,
- read_data,
get_case_path,
+ read_data,
read_data_from_file,
)
def __init__(self) -> None:
self.default_map: Dict[str, Any] = {}
+ self.params: Dict[str, Any] = {}
# Dummy root, since most of the tests don't care about it
self.obj: Dict[str, Any] = {"root": PROJECT_ROOT}
os.unlink(tmp_file)
self.assertFormatEqual(expected, actual)
+ @patch("black.dump_to_file", dump_to_stderr)
+ def test_one_empty_line(self) -> None:
+ mode = black.Mode(preview=True)
+ for nl in ["\n", "\r\n"]:
+ source = expected = nl
+ assert_format(source, expected, mode=mode)
+
+ def test_one_empty_line_ff(self) -> None:
+ mode = black.Mode(preview=True)
+ for nl in ["\n", "\r\n"]:
+ expected = nl
+ tmp_file = Path(black.dump_to_file(nl))
+ if system() == "Windows":
+ # Writing files in text mode automatically uses the system newline,
+ # but in this case we don't want this for testing reasons. See:
+ # https://github.com/psf/black/pull/3348
+ with open(tmp_file, "wb") as f:
+ f.write(nl.encode("utf-8"))
+ try:
+ self.assertFalse(
+ ff(tmp_file, mode=mode, write_back=black.WriteBack.YES)
+ )
+ with open(tmp_file, "rb") as f:
+ actual = f.read().decode("utf8")
+ finally:
+ os.unlink(tmp_file)
+ self.assertFormatEqual(expected, actual)
+
def test_experimental_string_processing_warns(self) -> None:
self.assertWarns(
black.mode.Deprecated, black.Mode, experimental_string_processing=True
def test_piping_diff(self) -> None:
diff_header = re.compile(
- r"(STDIN|STDOUT)\t\d\d\d\d-\d\d-\d\d \d\d:\d\d:\d\d\.\d\d\d\d\d\d "
- r"\+\d\d\d\d"
+ r"(STDIN|STDOUT)\t\d\d\d\d-\d\d-\d\d \d\d:\d\d:\d\d\.\d\d\d\d\d\d"
+ r"\+\d\d:\d\d"
)
source, _ = read_data("simple_cases", "expression.py")
expected, _ = read_data("simple_cases", "expression.diff")
versions = black.detect_target_versions(root)
self.assertIn(black.TargetVersion.PY38, versions)
+ def test_pep_695_version_detection(self) -> None:
+ for file in ("type_aliases", "type_params"):
+ source, _ = read_data("py_312", file)
+ root = black.lib2to3_parse(source)
+ features = black.get_features_used(root)
+ self.assertIn(black.Feature.TYPE_PARAMS, features)
+ versions = black.detect_target_versions(root)
+ self.assertIn(black.TargetVersion.PY312, versions)
+
def test_expression_ff(self) -> None:
source, expected = read_data("simple_cases", "expression.py")
tmp_file = Path(black.dump_to_file(source))
tmp_file = Path(black.dump_to_file(source))
diff_header = re.compile(
rf"{re.escape(str(tmp_file))}\t\d\d\d\d-\d\d-\d\d "
- r"\d\d:\d\d:\d\d\.\d\d\d\d\d\d \+\d\d\d\d"
+ r"\d\d:\d\d:\d\d\.\d\d\d\d\d\d\+\d\d:\d\d"
)
try:
result = BlackRunner().invoke(
versions = black.detect_target_versions(root)
self.assertIn(black.TargetVersion.PY38, versions)
+ def test_detect_debug_f_strings(self) -> None:
+ root = black.lib2to3_parse("""f"{x=}" """)
+ features = black.get_features_used(root)
+ self.assertIn(black.Feature.DEBUG_F_STRINGS, features)
+ versions = black.detect_target_versions(root)
+ self.assertIn(black.TargetVersion.PY38, versions)
+
+ root = black.lib2to3_parse(
+ """f"{x}"\nf'{"="}'\nf'{(x:=5)}'\nf'{f(a="3=")}'\nf'{x:=10}'\n"""
+ )
+ features = black.get_features_used(root)
+ self.assertNotIn(black.Feature.DEBUG_F_STRINGS, features)
+
+ # We don't yet support feature version detection in nested f-strings
+ root = black.lib2to3_parse(
+ """f"heard a rumour that { f'{1+1=}' } ... seems like it could be true" """
+ )
+ features = black.get_features_used(root)
+ self.assertNotIn(black.Feature.DEBUG_F_STRINGS, features)
+
@patch("black.dump_to_file", dump_to_stderr)
def test_string_quotes(self) -> None:
source, expected = read_data("miscellaneous", "string_quotes")
black.assert_equivalent(source, not_normalized)
black.assert_stable(source, not_normalized, mode=mode)
+ def test_skip_source_first_line(self) -> None:
+ source, _ = read_data("miscellaneous", "invalid_header")
+ tmp_file = Path(black.dump_to_file(source))
+ # Full source should fail (invalid syntax at header)
+ self.invokeBlack([str(tmp_file), "--diff", "--check"], exit_code=123)
+ # So, skipping the first line should work
+ result = BlackRunner().invoke(
+ black.main, [str(tmp_file), "-x", f"--config={EMPTY_CONFIG}"]
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(result.exit_code, 0)
+ with open(tmp_file, encoding="utf8") as f:
+ actual = f.read()
+ self.assertFormatEqual(source, actual)
+
+ def test_skip_source_first_line_when_mixing_newlines(self) -> None:
+ code_mixing_newlines = b"Header will be skipped\r\ni = [1,2,3]\nj = [1,2,3]\n"
+ expected = b"Header will be skipped\r\ni = [1, 2, 3]\nj = [1, 2, 3]\n"
+ with TemporaryDirectory() as workspace:
+ test_file = Path(workspace) / "skip_header.py"
+ test_file.write_bytes(code_mixing_newlines)
+ mode = replace(DEFAULT_MODE, skip_source_first_line=True)
+ ff(test_file, mode=mode, write_back=black.WriteBack.YES)
+ self.assertEqual(test_file.read_bytes(), expected)
+
def test_skip_magic_trailing_comma(self) -> None:
source, _ = read_data("simple_cases", "expression")
expected, _ = read_data(
tmp_file = Path(black.dump_to_file(source))
diff_header = re.compile(
rf"{re.escape(str(tmp_file))}\t\d\d\d\d-\d\d-\d\d "
- r"\d\d:\d\d:\d\d\.\d\d\d\d\d\d \+\d\d\d\d"
+ r"\d\d:\d\d:\d\d\.\d\d\d\d\d\d\+\d\d:\d\d"
)
try:
result = BlackRunner().invoke(
msg = (
"Expected diff isn't equal to the actual. If you made changes to"
" expression.py and this is an anticipated difference, overwrite"
- f" tests/data/expression_skip_magic_trailing_comma.diff with {dump}"
+ " tests/data/miscellaneous/expression_skip_magic_trailing_comma.diff"
+ f" with {dump}"
)
self.assertEqual(expected, actual, msg)
self.assertFormatEqual(contents_spc, fs(contents_spc))
self.assertFormatEqual(contents_spc, fs(contents_tab))
+ def test_false_positive_symlink_output_issue_3384(self) -> None:
+ # Emulate the behavior when using the CLI (`black ./child --verbose`), which
+ # involves patching some `pathlib.Path` methods. In particular, `is_dir` is
+ # patched only on its first call: when checking if "./child" is a directory it
+ # should return True. The "./child" folder exists relative to the cwd when
+ # running from CLI, but fails when running the tests because cwd is different
+ project_root = Path(THIS_DIR / "data" / "nested_gitignore_tests")
+ working_directory = project_root / "root"
+ target_abspath = working_directory / "child"
+ target_contents = (
+ src.relative_to(working_directory) for src in target_abspath.iterdir()
+ )
+
+ def mock_n_calls(responses: List[bool]) -> Callable[[], bool]:
+ def _mocked_calls() -> bool:
+ if responses:
+ return responses.pop(0)
+ return False
+
+ return _mocked_calls
+
+ with patch("pathlib.Path.iterdir", return_value=target_contents), patch(
+ "pathlib.Path.cwd", return_value=working_directory
+ ), patch("pathlib.Path.is_dir", side_effect=mock_n_calls([True])):
+ ctx = FakeContext()
+ ctx.obj["root"] = project_root
+ report = MagicMock(verbose=True)
+ black.get_sources(
+ ctx=ctx,
+ src=("./child",),
+ quiet=False,
+ verbose=True,
+ include=DEFAULT_INCLUDE,
+ exclude=None,
+ report=report,
+ extend_exclude=None,
+ force_exclude=None,
+ stdin_filename=None,
+ )
+ assert not any(
+ mock_args[1].startswith("is a symbolic link that points outside")
+ for _, mock_args, _ in report.path_ignored.mock_calls
+ ), "A symbolic link was reported."
+ report.path_ignored.assert_called_once_with(
+ Path("child", "b.py"), "matches a .gitignore file content"
+ )
+
def test_report_verbose(self) -> None:
report = Report(verbose=True)
out_lines = []
report.check = True
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2 files"
- " would fail to reformat.",
+ "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
+ " files would fail to reformat.",
)
report.check = False
report.diff = True
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2 files"
- " would fail to reformat.",
+ "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
+ " files would fail to reformat.",
)
def test_report_quiet(self) -> None:
report.check = True
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2 files"
- " would fail to reformat.",
+ "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
+ " files would fail to reformat.",
)
report.check = False
report.diff = True
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2 files"
- " would fail to reformat.",
+ "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
+ " files would fail to reformat.",
)
def test_report_normal(self) -> None:
report.check = True
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2 files"
- " would fail to reformat.",
+ "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
+ " files would fail to reformat.",
)
report.check = False
report.diff = True
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2 files"
- " would fail to reformat.",
+ "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
+ " files would fail to reformat.",
)
def test_lib2to3_parse(self) -> None:
)
def test_format_file_contents(self) -> None:
- empty = ""
mode = DEFAULT_MODE
+ empty = ""
with self.assertRaises(black.NothingChanged):
black.format_file_contents(empty, mode=mode, fast=False)
just_nl = "\n"
black.format_file_contents(invalid, mode=mode, fast=False)
self.assertEqual(str(e.exception), "Cannot parse: 1:7: return if you can")
+ mode = black.Mode(preview=True)
+ just_crlf = "\r\n"
+ with self.assertRaises(black.NothingChanged):
+ black.format_file_contents(just_crlf, mode=mode, fast=False)
+ just_whitespace_nl = "\n\t\n \n\t \n \t\n\n"
+ actual = black.format_file_contents(just_whitespace_nl, mode=mode, fast=False)
+ self.assertEqual("\n", actual)
+ just_whitespace_crlf = "\r\n\t\r\n \r\n\t \r\n \t\r\n\r\n"
+ actual = black.format_file_contents(just_whitespace_crlf, mode=mode, fast=False)
+ self.assertEqual("\r\n", actual)
+
def test_endmarker(self) -> None:
n = black.lib2to3_parse("\n")
self.assertEqual(n.type, black.syms.file_input)
report.done.assert_called_with(expected, black.Changed.YES)
def test_reformat_one_with_stdin_empty(self) -> None:
+ cases = [
+ ("", ""),
+ ("\n", "\n"),
+ ("\r\n", "\r\n"),
+ (" \t", ""),
+ (" \t\n\t ", "\n"),
+ (" \t\r\n\t ", "\r\n"),
+ ]
+
+ def _new_wrapper(
+ output: io.StringIO, io_TextIOWrapper: Type[io.TextIOWrapper]
+ ) -> Callable[[Any, Any], io.TextIOWrapper]:
+ def get_output(*args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> io.TextIOWrapper:
+ if args == (sys.stdout.buffer,):
+ # It's `format_stdin_to_stdout()` calling `io.TextIOWrapper()`,
+ # return our mock object.
+ return output
+ # It's something else (i.e. `decode_bytes()`) calling
+ # `io.TextIOWrapper()`, pass through to the original implementation.
+ # See discussion in https://github.com/psf/black/pull/2489
+ return io_TextIOWrapper(*args, **kwargs)
+
+ return get_output
+
+ mode = black.Mode(preview=True)
+ for content, expected in cases:
+ output = io.StringIO()
+ io_TextIOWrapper = io.TextIOWrapper
+
+ with patch("io.TextIOWrapper", _new_wrapper(output, io_TextIOWrapper)):
+ try:
+ black.format_stdin_to_stdout(
+ fast=True,
+ content=content,
+ write_back=black.WriteBack.YES,
+ mode=mode,
+ )
+ except io.UnsupportedOperation:
+ pass # StringIO does not support detach
+ assert output.getvalue() == expected
+
+ # An empty string is the only test case for `preview=False`
output = io.StringIO()
- with patch("io.TextIOWrapper", lambda *args, **kwargs: output):
+ io_TextIOWrapper = io.TextIOWrapper
+ with patch("io.TextIOWrapper", _new_wrapper(output, io_TextIOWrapper)):
try:
black.format_stdin_to_stdout(
fast=True,
if nl == "\n":
self.assertNotIn(b"\r\n", output)
+ def test_normalize_line_endings(self) -> None:
+ with TemporaryDirectory() as workspace:
+ test_file = Path(workspace) / "test.py"
+ for data, expected in (
+ (b"c\r\nc\n ", b"c\r\nc\r\n"),
+ (b"l\nl\r\n ", b"l\nl\n"),
+ ):
+ test_file.write_bytes(data)
+ ff(test_file, write_back=black.WriteBack.YES)
+ self.assertEqual(test_file.read_bytes(), expected)
+
def test_assert_equivalent_different_asts(self) -> None:
with self.assertRaises(AssertionError):
black.assert_equivalent("{}", "None")
self.assertEqual(config["exclude"], r"\.pyi?$")
self.assertEqual(config["include"], r"\.py?$")
+ def test_parse_pyproject_toml_project_metadata(self) -> None:
+ for test_toml, expected in [
+ ("only_black_pyproject.toml", ["py310"]),
+ ("only_metadata_pyproject.toml", ["py37", "py38", "py39", "py310"]),
+ ("neither_pyproject.toml", None),
+ ("both_pyproject.toml", ["py310"]),
+ ]:
+ test_toml_file = THIS_DIR / "data" / "project_metadata" / test_toml
+ config = black.parse_pyproject_toml(str(test_toml_file))
+ self.assertEqual(config.get("target_version"), expected)
+
+ def test_infer_target_version(self) -> None:
+ for version, expected in [
+ ("3.6", [TargetVersion.PY36]),
+ ("3.11.0rc1", [TargetVersion.PY311]),
+ (">=3.10", [TargetVersion.PY310, TargetVersion.PY311, TargetVersion.PY312]),
+ (
+ ">=3.10.6",
+ [TargetVersion.PY310, TargetVersion.PY311, TargetVersion.PY312],
+ ),
+ ("<3.6", [TargetVersion.PY33, TargetVersion.PY34, TargetVersion.PY35]),
+ (">3.7,<3.10", [TargetVersion.PY38, TargetVersion.PY39]),
+ (
+ ">3.7,!=3.8,!=3.9",
+ [TargetVersion.PY310, TargetVersion.PY311, TargetVersion.PY312],
+ ),
+ (
+ "> 3.9.4, != 3.10.3",
+ [
+ TargetVersion.PY39,
+ TargetVersion.PY310,
+ TargetVersion.PY311,
+ TargetVersion.PY312,
+ ],
+ ),
+ (
+ "!=3.3,!=3.4",
+ [
+ TargetVersion.PY35,
+ TargetVersion.PY36,
+ TargetVersion.PY37,
+ TargetVersion.PY38,
+ TargetVersion.PY39,
+ TargetVersion.PY310,
+ TargetVersion.PY311,
+ TargetVersion.PY312,
+ ],
+ ),
+ (
+ "==3.*",
+ [
+ TargetVersion.PY33,
+ TargetVersion.PY34,
+ TargetVersion.PY35,
+ TargetVersion.PY36,
+ TargetVersion.PY37,
+ TargetVersion.PY38,
+ TargetVersion.PY39,
+ TargetVersion.PY310,
+ TargetVersion.PY311,
+ TargetVersion.PY312,
+ ],
+ ),
+ ("==3.8.*", [TargetVersion.PY38]),
+ (None, None),
+ ("", None),
+ ("invalid", None),
+ ("==invalid", None),
+ (">3.9,!=invalid", None),
+ ("3", None),
+ ("3.2", None),
+ ("2.7.18", None),
+ ("==2.7", None),
+ (">3.10,<3.11", None),
+ ]:
+ test_toml = {"project": {"requires-python": version}}
+ result = black.files.infer_target_version(test_toml)
+ self.assertEqual(result, expected)
+
def test_read_pyproject_toml(self) -> None:
test_toml_file = THIS_DIR / "test.toml"
fake_ctx = FakeContext()
self.assertEqual(config["exclude"], r"\.pyi?$")
self.assertEqual(config["include"], r"\.py?$")
+ def test_read_pyproject_toml_from_stdin(self) -> None:
+ with TemporaryDirectory() as workspace:
+ root = Path(workspace)
+
+ src_dir = root / "src"
+ src_dir.mkdir()
+
+ src_pyproject = src_dir / "pyproject.toml"
+ src_pyproject.touch()
+
+ test_toml_file = THIS_DIR / "test.toml"
+ src_pyproject.write_text(test_toml_file.read_text())
+
+ src_python = src_dir / "foo.py"
+ src_python.touch()
+
+ fake_ctx = FakeContext()
+ fake_ctx.params["src"] = ("-",)
+ fake_ctx.params["stdin_filename"] = str(src_python)
+
+ with change_directory(root):
+ black.read_pyproject_toml(fake_ctx, FakeParameter(), None)
+
+ config = fake_ctx.default_map
+ self.assertEqual(config["verbose"], "1")
+ self.assertEqual(config["check"], "no")
+ self.assertEqual(config["diff"], "y")
+ self.assertEqual(config["color"], "True")
+ self.assertEqual(config["line_length"], "79")
+ self.assertEqual(config["target_version"], ["py36", "py37", "py38"])
+ self.assertEqual(config["exclude"], r"\.pyi?$")
+ self.assertEqual(config["include"], r"\.py?$")
+
@pytest.mark.incompatible_with_mypyc
def test_find_project_root(self) -> None:
with TemporaryDirectory() as workspace:
(src_dir.resolve(), "pyproject.toml"),
)
+ with change_directory(test_dir):
+ self.assertEqual(
+ black.find_project_root(("-",), stdin_filename="../src/a.py"),
+ (src_dir.resolve(), "pyproject.toml"),
+ )
+
@patch(
"black.files.find_user_pyproject_toml",
)
black.assert_stable(source, output, mode=DEFAULT_MODE)
def test_bpo_2142_workaround(self) -> None:
-
# https://bugs.python.org/issue2142
source, _ = read_data("miscellaneous", "missing_final_newline")
tmp_file = Path(black.dump_to_file(source, ensure_final_newline=False))
diff_header = re.compile(
rf"{re.escape(str(tmp_file))}\t\d\d\d\d-\d\d-\d\d "
- r"\d\d:\d\d:\d\d\.\d\d\d\d\d\d \+\d\d\d\d"
+ r"\d\d:\d\d:\d\d\.\d\d\d\d\d\d\+\d\d:\d\d"
)
try:
result = BlackRunner().invoke(black.main, ["--diff", str(tmp_file)])
src = (workspace / f"test{tag}.py").resolve()
with src.open("w") as fobj:
fobj.write("print('hello')")
- with patch("black.Manager", wraps=multiprocessing.Manager) as mgr:
+ with patch(
+ "black.concurrency.Manager", wraps=multiprocessing.Manager
+ ) as mgr:
cmd = ["--diff", str(workspace)]
if color:
cmd.append("--color")
str(cached): black.get_cache_info(cached),
str(cached_but_changed): (0.0, 0),
}
- todo, done = black.filter_cached(
+ todo, done = black.cache.filter_cached(
cache, {uncached, cached, cached_but_changed}
)
assert todo == {uncached, cached_but_changed}
ctx.obj["root"] = base
assert_collected_sources(src, expected, ctx=ctx, extend_exclude=r"/exclude/")
+ def test_gitignore_used_on_multiple_sources(self) -> None:
+ root = Path(DATA_DIR / "gitignore_used_on_multiple_sources")
+ expected = [
+ root / "dir1" / "b.py",
+ root / "dir2" / "b.py",
+ ]
+ ctx = FakeContext()
+ ctx.obj["root"] = root
+ src = [root / "dir1", root / "dir2"]
+ assert_collected_sources(src, expected, ctx=ctx)
+
@patch("black.find_project_root", lambda *args: (THIS_DIR.resolve(), None))
def test_exclude_for_issue_1572(self) -> None:
# Exclude shouldn't touch files that were explicitly given to Black through the
None,
None,
report,
- gitignore,
+ {path: gitignore},
verbose=False,
quiet=False,
)
None,
None,
report,
- root_gitignore,
+ {path: root_gitignore},
verbose=False,
quiet=False,
)
)
assert sorted(expected) == sorted(sources)
+ def test_nested_gitignore_directly_in_source_directory(self) -> None:
+ # https://github.com/psf/black/issues/2598
+ path = Path(DATA_DIR / "nested_gitignore_tests")
+ src = Path(path / "root" / "child")
+ expected = [src / "a.py", src / "c.py"]
+ assert_collected_sources([src], expected)
+
def test_invalid_gitignore(self) -> None:
path = THIS_DIR / "data" / "invalid_gitignore_tests"
empty_config = path / "pyproject.toml"
gitignore = path / "a" / ".gitignore"
assert f"Could not parse {gitignore}" in result.stderr_bytes.decode()
+ def test_gitignore_that_ignores_subfolders(self) -> None:
+ # If gitignore with */* is in root
+ root = Path(DATA_DIR / "ignore_subfolders_gitignore_tests" / "subdir")
+ expected = [root / "b.py"]
+ ctx = FakeContext()
+ ctx.obj["root"] = root
+ assert_collected_sources([root], expected, ctx=ctx)
+
+ # If .gitignore with */* is nested
+ root = Path(DATA_DIR / "ignore_subfolders_gitignore_tests")
+ expected = [
+ root / "a.py",
+ root / "subdir" / "b.py",
+ ]
+ ctx = FakeContext()
+ ctx.obj["root"] = root
+ assert_collected_sources([root], expected, ctx=ctx)
+
+ # If command is executed from outer dir
+ root = Path(DATA_DIR / "ignore_subfolders_gitignore_tests")
+ target = root / "subdir"
+ expected = [target / "b.py"]
+ ctx = FakeContext()
+ ctx.obj["root"] = root
+ assert_collected_sources([target], expected, ctx=ctx)
+
def test_empty_include(self) -> None:
path = DATA_DIR / "include_exclude_tests"
src = [path]
None,
None,
report,
- gitignore,
+ {path: gitignore},
verbose=False,
quiet=False,
)
projects / etc / vim.git / blobdiff