still proposed on the issue tracker. See
[The Black Code Style](the_black_code_style/index.rst) for more details.
+Starting in 2022, the formatting output will be stable for the releases made in the same
+year (other than unintentional bugs). It is possible to opt-in to the latest formatting
+styles, using the `--future` flag.
+
## Why is my file not formatted?
Most likely because it is ignored in `.gitignore` or excluded with configuration. See
[file collection and discovery](usage_and_configuration/file_collection_and_discovery.md)
for details.
+## Why is my Jupyter Notebook cell not formatted?
+
+_Black_ is timid about formatting Jupyter Notebooks. Cells containing any of the
+following will not be formatted:
+
+- automagics (e.g. `pip install black`)
+- multiline magics, e.g.:
+
+ ```python
+ %timeit f(1, \
+ 2, \
+ 3)
+ ```
+
+- code which `IPython`'s `TransformerManager` would transform magics into, e.g.:
+
+ ```python
+ get_ipython().system('ls')
+ ```
+
+- invalid syntax, as it can't be safely distinguished from automagics in the absence of
+ a running `IPython` kernel.
+
## Why are Flake8's E203 and W503 violated?
Because they go against PEP 8. E203 falsely triggers on list
## Does Black support Python 2?
+```{warning}
+Python 2 support has been deprecated since 21.10b0.
+
+This support will be dropped in the first stable release, expected for January 2022.
+See [The Black Code Style](the_black_code_style/index.rst) for details.
+```
+
For formatting, yes! [Install](getting_started.md#installation) with the `python2` extra
-to format Python 2 files too! There are no current plans to drop support, but most
-likely it is bound to happen. Sometime. Eventually. In terms of running _Black_ though,
-Python 3.6 or newer is required.
+to format Python 2 files too! In terms of running _Black_ though, Python 3.6 or newer is
+required.
## Why does my linter or typechecker complain after I format my code?