+def re_compile_maybe_verbose(regex: str) -> Pattern[str]:
+ """Compile a regular expression string in `regex`.
+
+ If it contains newlines, use verbose mode.
+ """
+ if "\n" in regex:
+ regex = "(?x)" + regex
+ return re.compile(regex)
+
+
+def enumerate_reversed(sequence: Sequence[T]) -> Iterator[Tuple[Index, T]]:
+ """Like `reversed(enumerate(sequence))` if that were possible."""
+ index = len(sequence) - 1
+ for element in reversed(sequence):
+ yield (index, element)
+ index -= 1
+
+
+def enumerate_with_length(
+ line: Line, reversed: bool = False
+) -> Iterator[Tuple[Index, Leaf, int]]:
+ """Return an enumeration of leaves with their length.
+
+ Stops prematurely on multiline strings and standalone comments.
+ """
+ op = cast(
+ Callable[[Sequence[Leaf]], Iterator[Tuple[Index, Leaf]]],
+ enumerate_reversed if reversed else enumerate,
+ )
+ for index, leaf in op(line.leaves):
+ length = len(leaf.prefix) + len(leaf.value)
+ if "\n" in leaf.value:
+ return # Multiline strings, we can't continue.
+
+ for comment in line.comments_after(leaf):
+ length += len(comment.value)
+
+ yield index, leaf, length
+
+
+def is_line_short_enough(line: Line, *, line_length: int, line_str: str = "") -> bool:
+ """Return True if `line` is no longer than `line_length`.
+
+ Uses the provided `line_str` rendering, if any, otherwise computes a new one.
+ """
+ if not line_str:
+ line_str = str(line).strip("\n")
+ return (
+ len(line_str) <= line_length
+ and "\n" not in line_str # multiline strings
+ and not line.contains_standalone_comments()
+ )
+
+
+def can_be_split(line: Line) -> bool:
+ """Return False if the line cannot be split *for sure*.
+
+ This is not an exhaustive search but a cheap heuristic that we can use to
+ avoid some unfortunate formattings (mostly around wrapping unsplittable code
+ in unnecessary parentheses).
+ """
+ leaves = line.leaves
+ if len(leaves) < 2:
+ return False
+
+ if leaves[0].type == token.STRING and leaves[1].type == token.DOT:
+ call_count = 0
+ dot_count = 0
+ next = leaves[-1]
+ for leaf in leaves[-2::-1]:
+ if leaf.type in OPENING_BRACKETS:
+ if next.type not in CLOSING_BRACKETS:
+ return False
+
+ call_count += 1
+ elif leaf.type == token.DOT:
+ dot_count += 1
+ elif leaf.type == token.NAME:
+ if not (next.type == token.DOT or next.type in OPENING_BRACKETS):
+ return False
+
+ elif leaf.type not in CLOSING_BRACKETS:
+ return False
+
+ if dot_count > 1 and call_count > 1:
+ return False
+
+ return True
+
+
+def can_omit_invisible_parens(line: Line, line_length: int) -> bool:
+ """Does `line` have a shape safe to reformat without optional parens around it?
+
+ Returns True for only a subset of potentially nice looking formattings but
+ the point is to not return false positives that end up producing lines that
+ are too long.
+ """
+ bt = line.bracket_tracker
+ if not bt.delimiters:
+ # Without delimiters the optional parentheses are useless.
+ return True
+
+ max_priority = bt.max_delimiter_priority()
+ if bt.delimiter_count_with_priority(max_priority) > 1:
+ # With more than one delimiter of a kind the optional parentheses read better.
+ return False
+
+ if max_priority == DOT_PRIORITY:
+ # A single stranded method call doesn't require optional parentheses.
+ return True