Merge commit '882d8795c6ff65c02f2657e596391748d1b6b7f5'

[etc/vim.git] / .vim / bundle / black / tests / data / cases / comments5.py

diff --git a/.vim/bundle/black/tests/data/cases/comments5.py b/.vim/bundle/black/tests/data/cases/comments5.py
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..bda4061
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.vim/bundle/black/tests/data/cases/comments5.py
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+while True:
+    if something.changed:
+        do.stuff()  # trailing comment
+        # Comment belongs to the `if` block.
+    # This one belongs to the `while` block.
+
+    # Should this one, too?  I guess so.
+
+# This one is properly standalone now.
+
+for i in range(100):
+    # first we do this
+    if i % 33 == 0:
+        break
+
+    # then we do this
+    print(i)
+    # and finally we loop around
+
+with open(some_temp_file) as f:
+    data = f.read()
+
+try:
+    with open(some_other_file) as w:
+        w.write(data)
+
+except OSError:
+    print("problems")
+
+import sys
+
+
+# leading function comment
+def wat():
+    ...
+    # trailing function comment
+
+
+# SECTION COMMENT
+
+
+# leading 1
+@deco1
+# leading 2
+@deco2(with_args=True)
+# leading 3
+@deco3
+def decorated1():
+    ...
+
+
+# leading 1
+@deco1
+# leading 2
+@deco2(with_args=True)
+# leading function comment
+def decorated1():
+    ...
+
+
+# Note: this is fixed in
+# Preview.empty_lines_before_class_or_def_with_leading_comments.
+# In the current style, the user will have to split those lines by hand.
+some_instruction
+
+
+# This comment should be split from `some_instruction` by two lines but isn't.
+def g():
+    ...
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    main()