def test_piping_diff(self) -> None:
diff_header = re.compile(
- r"(STDIN|STDOUT)\t\d\d\d\d-\d\d-\d\d \d\d:\d\d:\d\d\.\d\d\d\d\d\d "
- r"\+\d\d\d\d"
+ r"(STDIN|STDOUT)\t\d\d\d\d-\d\d-\d\d \d\d:\d\d:\d\d\.\d\d\d\d\d\d"
+ r"\+\d\d:\d\d"
)
source, _ = read_data("simple_cases", "expression.py")
expected, _ = read_data("simple_cases", "expression.diff")
versions = black.detect_target_versions(root)
self.assertIn(black.TargetVersion.PY38, versions)
+ def test_pep_695_version_detection(self) -> None:
+ for file in ("type_aliases", "type_params"):
+ source, _ = read_data("py_312", file)
+ root = black.lib2to3_parse(source)
+ features = black.get_features_used(root)
+ self.assertIn(black.Feature.TYPE_PARAMS, features)
+ versions = black.detect_target_versions(root)
+ self.assertIn(black.TargetVersion.PY312, versions)
+
def test_expression_ff(self) -> None:
source, expected = read_data("simple_cases", "expression.py")
tmp_file = Path(black.dump_to_file(source))
tmp_file = Path(black.dump_to_file(source))
diff_header = re.compile(
rf"{re.escape(str(tmp_file))}\t\d\d\d\d-\d\d-\d\d "
- r"\d\d:\d\d:\d\d\.\d\d\d\d\d\d \+\d\d\d\d"
+ r"\d\d:\d\d:\d\d\.\d\d\d\d\d\d\+\d\d:\d\d"
)
try:
result = BlackRunner().invoke(
tmp_file = Path(black.dump_to_file(source))
diff_header = re.compile(
rf"{re.escape(str(tmp_file))}\t\d\d\d\d-\d\d-\d\d "
- r"\d\d:\d\d:\d\d\.\d\d\d\d\d\d \+\d\d\d\d"
+ r"\d\d:\d\d:\d\d\.\d\d\d\d\d\d\+\d\d:\d\d"
)
try:
result = BlackRunner().invoke(
msg = (
"Expected diff isn't equal to the actual. If you made changes to"
" expression.py and this is an anticipated difference, overwrite"
- f" tests/data/expression_skip_magic_trailing_comma.diff with {dump}"
+ " tests/data/miscellaneous/expression_skip_magic_trailing_comma.diff"
+ f" with {dump}"
)
self.assertEqual(expected, actual, msg)
self.assertFormatEqual(contents_spc, fs(contents_spc))
self.assertFormatEqual(contents_spc, fs(contents_tab))
+ def test_false_positive_symlink_output_issue_3384(self) -> None:
+ # Emulate the behavior when using the CLI (`black ./child --verbose`), which
+ # involves patching some `pathlib.Path` methods. In particular, `is_dir` is
+ # patched only on its first call: when checking if "./child" is a directory it
+ # should return True. The "./child" folder exists relative to the cwd when
+ # running from CLI, but fails when running the tests because cwd is different
+ project_root = Path(THIS_DIR / "data" / "nested_gitignore_tests")
+ working_directory = project_root / "root"
+ target_abspath = working_directory / "child"
+ target_contents = (
+ src.relative_to(working_directory) for src in target_abspath.iterdir()
+ )
+
+ def mock_n_calls(responses: List[bool]) -> Callable[[], bool]:
+ def _mocked_calls() -> bool:
+ if responses:
+ return responses.pop(0)
+ return False
+
+ return _mocked_calls
+
+ with patch("pathlib.Path.iterdir", return_value=target_contents), patch(
+ "pathlib.Path.cwd", return_value=working_directory
+ ), patch("pathlib.Path.is_dir", side_effect=mock_n_calls([True])):
+ ctx = FakeContext()
+ ctx.obj["root"] = project_root
+ report = MagicMock(verbose=True)
+ black.get_sources(
+ ctx=ctx,
+ src=("./child",),
+ quiet=False,
+ verbose=True,
+ include=DEFAULT_INCLUDE,
+ exclude=None,
+ report=report,
+ extend_exclude=None,
+ force_exclude=None,
+ stdin_filename=None,
+ )
+ assert not any(
+ mock_args[1].startswith("is a symbolic link that points outside")
+ for _, mock_args, _ in report.path_ignored.mock_calls
+ ), "A symbolic link was reported."
+ report.path_ignored.assert_called_once_with(
+ Path("child", "b.py"), "matches a .gitignore file content"
+ )
+
def test_report_verbose(self) -> None:
report = Report(verbose=True)
out_lines = []
self.assertEqual(err_lines[-1], "error: cannot format e1: boom")
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "1 file reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 1 file failed to"
- " reformat."
- ),
+ "1 file reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 1 file failed to"
+ " reformat.",
)
self.assertEqual(report.return_code, 123)
report.done(Path("f3"), black.Changed.YES)
self.assertEqual(out_lines[-1], "reformatted f3")
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 1 file failed to"
- " reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 1 file failed to"
+ " reformat.",
)
self.assertEqual(report.return_code, 123)
report.failed(Path("e2"), "boom")
self.assertEqual(err_lines[-1], "error: cannot format e2: boom")
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
- " reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
+ " reformat.",
)
self.assertEqual(report.return_code, 123)
report.path_ignored(Path("wat"), "no match")
self.assertEqual(out_lines[-1], "wat ignored: no match")
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
- " reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
+ " reformat.",
)
self.assertEqual(report.return_code, 123)
report.done(Path("f4"), black.Changed.NO)
self.assertEqual(out_lines[-1], "f4 already well formatted, good job.")
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files reformatted, 3 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
- " reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files reformatted, 3 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
+ " reformat.",
)
self.assertEqual(report.return_code, 123)
report.check = True
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
- " files would fail to reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
+ " files would fail to reformat.",
)
report.check = False
report.diff = True
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
- " files would fail to reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
+ " files would fail to reformat.",
)
def test_report_quiet(self) -> None:
self.assertEqual(err_lines[-1], "error: cannot format e1: boom")
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "1 file reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 1 file failed to"
- " reformat."
- ),
+ "1 file reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 1 file failed to"
+ " reformat.",
)
self.assertEqual(report.return_code, 123)
report.done(Path("f3"), black.Changed.YES)
self.assertEqual(len(err_lines), 1)
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 1 file failed to"
- " reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 1 file failed to"
+ " reformat.",
)
self.assertEqual(report.return_code, 123)
report.failed(Path("e2"), "boom")
self.assertEqual(err_lines[-1], "error: cannot format e2: boom")
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
- " reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
+ " reformat.",
)
self.assertEqual(report.return_code, 123)
report.path_ignored(Path("wat"), "no match")
self.assertEqual(len(err_lines), 2)
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
- " reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
+ " reformat.",
)
self.assertEqual(report.return_code, 123)
report.done(Path("f4"), black.Changed.NO)
self.assertEqual(len(err_lines), 2)
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files reformatted, 3 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
- " reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files reformatted, 3 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
+ " reformat.",
)
self.assertEqual(report.return_code, 123)
report.check = True
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
- " files would fail to reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
+ " files would fail to reformat.",
)
report.check = False
report.diff = True
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
- " files would fail to reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
+ " files would fail to reformat.",
)
def test_report_normal(self) -> None:
self.assertEqual(err_lines[-1], "error: cannot format e1: boom")
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "1 file reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 1 file failed to"
- " reformat."
- ),
+ "1 file reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 1 file failed to"
+ " reformat.",
)
self.assertEqual(report.return_code, 123)
report.done(Path("f3"), black.Changed.YES)
self.assertEqual(out_lines[-1], "reformatted f3")
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 1 file failed to"
- " reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 1 file failed to"
+ " reformat.",
)
self.assertEqual(report.return_code, 123)
report.failed(Path("e2"), "boom")
self.assertEqual(err_lines[-1], "error: cannot format e2: boom")
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
- " reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
+ " reformat.",
)
self.assertEqual(report.return_code, 123)
report.path_ignored(Path("wat"), "no match")
self.assertEqual(len(err_lines), 2)
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
- " reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files reformatted, 2 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
+ " reformat.",
)
self.assertEqual(report.return_code, 123)
report.done(Path("f4"), black.Changed.NO)
self.assertEqual(len(err_lines), 2)
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files reformatted, 3 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
- " reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files reformatted, 3 files left unchanged, 2 files failed to"
+ " reformat.",
)
self.assertEqual(report.return_code, 123)
report.check = True
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
- " files would fail to reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
+ " files would fail to reformat.",
)
report.check = False
report.diff = True
self.assertEqual(
unstyle(str(report)),
- (
- "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
- " files would fail to reformat."
- ),
+ "2 files would be reformatted, 3 files would be left unchanged, 2"
+ " files would fail to reformat.",
)
def test_lib2to3_parse(self) -> None:
self.assertEqual(config["exclude"], r"\.pyi?$")
self.assertEqual(config["include"], r"\.py?$")
+ def test_parse_pyproject_toml_project_metadata(self) -> None:
+ for test_toml, expected in [
+ ("only_black_pyproject.toml", ["py310"]),
+ ("only_metadata_pyproject.toml", ["py37", "py38", "py39", "py310"]),
+ ("neither_pyproject.toml", None),
+ ("both_pyproject.toml", ["py310"]),
+ ]:
+ test_toml_file = THIS_DIR / "data" / "project_metadata" / test_toml
+ config = black.parse_pyproject_toml(str(test_toml_file))
+ self.assertEqual(config.get("target_version"), expected)
+
+ def test_infer_target_version(self) -> None:
+ for version, expected in [
+ ("3.6", [TargetVersion.PY36]),
+ ("3.11.0rc1", [TargetVersion.PY311]),
+ (">=3.10", [TargetVersion.PY310, TargetVersion.PY311, TargetVersion.PY312]),
+ (
+ ">=3.10.6",
+ [TargetVersion.PY310, TargetVersion.PY311, TargetVersion.PY312],
+ ),
+ ("<3.6", [TargetVersion.PY33, TargetVersion.PY34, TargetVersion.PY35]),
+ (">3.7,<3.10", [TargetVersion.PY38, TargetVersion.PY39]),
+ (
+ ">3.7,!=3.8,!=3.9",
+ [TargetVersion.PY310, TargetVersion.PY311, TargetVersion.PY312],
+ ),
+ (
+ "> 3.9.4, != 3.10.3",
+ [
+ TargetVersion.PY39,
+ TargetVersion.PY310,
+ TargetVersion.PY311,
+ TargetVersion.PY312,
+ ],
+ ),
+ (
+ "!=3.3,!=3.4",
+ [
+ TargetVersion.PY35,
+ TargetVersion.PY36,
+ TargetVersion.PY37,
+ TargetVersion.PY38,
+ TargetVersion.PY39,
+ TargetVersion.PY310,
+ TargetVersion.PY311,
+ TargetVersion.PY312,
+ ],
+ ),
+ (
+ "==3.*",
+ [
+ TargetVersion.PY33,
+ TargetVersion.PY34,
+ TargetVersion.PY35,
+ TargetVersion.PY36,
+ TargetVersion.PY37,
+ TargetVersion.PY38,
+ TargetVersion.PY39,
+ TargetVersion.PY310,
+ TargetVersion.PY311,
+ TargetVersion.PY312,
+ ],
+ ),
+ ("==3.8.*", [TargetVersion.PY38]),
+ (None, None),
+ ("", None),
+ ("invalid", None),
+ ("==invalid", None),
+ (">3.9,!=invalid", None),
+ ("3", None),
+ ("3.2", None),
+ ("2.7.18", None),
+ ("==2.7", None),
+ (">3.10,<3.11", None),
+ ]:
+ test_toml = {"project": {"requires-python": version}}
+ result = black.files.infer_target_version(test_toml)
+ self.assertEqual(result, expected)
+
def test_read_pyproject_toml(self) -> None:
test_toml_file = THIS_DIR / "test.toml"
fake_ctx = FakeContext()
tmp_file = Path(black.dump_to_file(source, ensure_final_newline=False))
diff_header = re.compile(
rf"{re.escape(str(tmp_file))}\t\d\d\d\d-\d\d-\d\d "
- r"\d\d:\d\d:\d\d\.\d\d\d\d\d\d \+\d\d\d\d"
+ r"\d\d:\d\d:\d\d\.\d\d\d\d\d\d\+\d\d:\d\d"
)
try:
result = BlackRunner().invoke(black.main, ["--diff", str(tmp_file)])
projects / etc / vim.git / blobdiff