Bump furo from 2022.12.7 to 2023.3.23 in /docs (#3624)

[etc/vim.git] / docs / faq.md

diff --git a/docs/faq.md b/docs/faq.md
index 264141e3f39c61b014ee6322e26ec59b4abebbf4..a6a422c2fece815b0605f390f7a563a5a288b291 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/faq.md
+++ b/docs/faq.md
@@ -8,10 +8,22 @@ The most common questions and issues users face are aggregated to this FAQ.
 :class: this-will-duplicate-information-and-it-is-still-useful-here
 ```
 
+## Why spaces? I prefer tabs
+
+PEP 8 recommends spaces over tabs, and they are used by most of the Python community.
+_Black_ provides no options to configure the indentation style, and requests for such
+options will not be considered.
+
+However, we recognise that using tabs is an accessibility issue as well. While the
+option will never be added to _Black_, visually impaired developers may find conversion
+tools such as `expand/unexpand` (for Linux) useful when contributing to Python projects.
+A workflow might consist of e.g. setting up appropriate pre-commit and post-merge git
+hooks, and scripting `unexpand` to run after applying _Black_.
+
 ## Does Black have an API?
 
 Not yet. _Black_ is fundamentally a command line tool. Many
-[integrations](integrations/index.rst) are provided, but a Python interface is not one
+[integrations](/integrations/index.md) are provided, but a Python interface is not one
 of them. A simple API is being [planned](https://github.com/psf/black/issues/779)
 though.
 
@@ -27,7 +39,7 @@ other tools, such as `# noqa`, may be moved by _Black_. See below for more detai
 ## How stable is Black's style?
 
 Stable. _Black_ aims to enforce one style and one style only, with some room for
-pragmatism. See [The Black Code Style](the_black_code_style/index.rst) for more details.
+pragmatism. See [The Black Code Style](the_black_code_style/index.md) for more details.
 
 Starting in 2022, the formatting output will be stable for the releases made in the same
 year (other than unintentional bugs). It is possible to opt-in to the latest formatting
@@ -45,7 +57,8 @@ _Black_ is timid about formatting Jupyter Notebooks. Cells containing any of the
 following will not be formatted:
 
 - automagics (e.g. `pip install black`)
-- non-Python cell magics (e.g. `%%writeline`)
+- non-Python cell magics (e.g. `%%writeline`). These can be added with the flag
+  `--python-cell-magics`, e.g. `black --python-cell-magics writeline hello.ipynb`.
 - multiline magics, e.g.:
 
   ```python
@@ -73,8 +86,8 @@ disabled-by-default counterpart W504. E203 should be disabled while changes are
 
 ## Which Python versions does Black support?
 
-Currently the runtime requires Python 3.6-3.10. Formatting is supported for files
-containing syntax from Python 3.3 to 3.10. We promise to support at least all Python
+Currently the runtime requires Python 3.7-3.11. Formatting is supported for files
+containing syntax from Python 3.3 to 3.11. We promise to support at least all Python
 versions that have not reached their end of life. This is the case for both running
 _Black_ and formatting code.
 
@@ -82,6 +95,8 @@ Support for formatting Python 2 code was removed in version 22.0. While we've ma
 plans to stop supporting older Python 3 minor versions immediately, their support might
 also be removed some time in the future without a deprecation period.
 
+Runtime support for 3.6 was removed in version 22.10.0.
+
 ## Why does my linter or typechecker complain after I format my code?
 
 Some linters and other tools use magical comments (e.g., `# noqa`, `# type: ignore`) to
@@ -100,3 +115,24 @@ _Black_ is an autoformatter, not a Python linter or interpreter. Detecting all s
 errors is not a goal. It can format all code accepted by CPython (if you find an example
 where that doesn't hold, please report a bug!), but it may also format some code that
 CPython doesn't accept.
+
+(labels/mypyc-support)=
+
+## What is `compiled: yes/no` all about in the version output?
+
+While _Black_ is indeed a pure Python project, we use [mypyc] to compile _Black_ into a
+C Python extension, usually doubling performance. These compiled wheels are available
+for 64-bit versions of Windows, Linux (via the manylinux standard), and macOS across all
+supported CPython versions.
+
+Platforms including musl-based and/or ARM Linux distributions, and ARM Windows are
+currently **not** supported. These platforms will fall back to the slower pure Python
+wheel available on PyPI.
+
+If you are experiencing exceptionally weird issues or even segfaults, you can try
+passing `--no-binary black` to your pip install invocation. This flag excludes all
+wheels (including the pure Python wheel), so this command will use the [sdist].
+
+[mypyc]: https://mypyc.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
+[sdist]:
+  https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/glossary/#term-Source-Distribution-or-sdist